An analysis of an inconvenient truth a book on the controversial issue of global warming

May 25, The prospect of watching a former Vice-President of the United States give a "PowerPoint presentation" probably does not sound too exciting. If I told you that the VP was Al Gore and his presentation was on yawn global warming, that may not help peak your excitement much. Where was this guy during the campaign?

An analysis of an inconvenient truth a book on the controversial issue of global warming

The Nobel Committee cited Gore's longstanding commitment to raising public awareness of global warming and of the changes needed to prevent it from worsening. His most well-known work to date on these issues is this film. Gore has been an environmental activist for decades.

He became convinced of the reality of climate change during his college days in the s and organized the first Congressional hearings on global warming in Since he has been giving a slideshow on global warming to audiences around the world, and much of An Inconvenient Truth is footage of the most recent incarnation of his presentation.

This sounds like a recipe for boredom, but in fact the movie is gripping.

Create your account

The graphics are sophisticated, the images terrifying, and Gore makes the mass of facts and statistics meaningful and dramatic. To lighten the grim mood, he cracks jokes and even uses cartoons from time to time to illustrate scientific concepts.

Gore also uses his human side to bring the points home. Deftly interweaving his own personal and political history, he describes the events in his life that led him to care so deeply about the issue and then links them to the bigger picture. For example, he relates how his family didn't stop growing tobacco until after his older sister's death in from lung cancer, and explains how this helped him understand the human tendency to resist changing one's habits until something goes terribly wrong.

In sum, the solutions he proposes are to emit less greenhouse gases by saving energy, and to absorb more gases by planting trees and vegetation. He ends by calling on the audience to learn more about ways to help. Is the Film Partisan? Gore stresses that the issue of global warming is not and should not be treated as a partisan one, yet he cannot resist making cutting remarks about the Bush administration from time to time, some joking, some very serious.

For example, he discusses Philip Cooney, formerly chief of staff to President Bush's Council on Environmental Quality and, before that, a lobbyist for the American Petroleum Institute, who resigned in after it was revealed that he had edited government reports on climate change, downplaying the role of carbon dioxide emissions.

Gore is passionate to convince everyone of whatever political stripe that we are witnessing a global catastrophe in the making.

It can be averted, he argues, but only through collective action, on both the personal and political level. The sticking point, then as now, was that there were no binding targets and requirements for developing nations to reduce emissions, combined with fears about the effect on the U.

InGore signed the Protocol as a symbolic gesture. At present the U. As of Novembercountries and other government entities had ratified the Protocol.

Among them are developing countries, including China and India, but these developing nations have no obligation beyond monitoring and reporting emissions. Reactions to the Film The reaction of climate scientists to the film has been mixed.

An analysis of an inconvenient truth a book on the controversial issue of global warming

The majority of them believe that the human contribution to global warming is significant and therefore many endorse the film, although with varying degrees of qualification. Some point to minor errors, such as Gore's claim that the effects of the U.

Clean Air Actas registered in aerosol concentrations in Antarctic ice cores, are visible to the naked eye they are notbut they underscore that such errors take nothing away from the film's main conclusions.

Others have expressed concern over what they see as 'alarmist' elements of the film, such as its portrayal of future coastal flooding due to the melting of Greenland as something "impending.

Two uninhabited Pacific islands have already disappeared and others are becoming uninhabitable see Sea Level Rise by the World Wildlife Fund. A relatively small group of climate scientists disputes that human activities contribute in any significant way to global warming.

An Inconvenient Truth - Wikipedia

This group, naturally, rejects the main conclusions of the film. For more on scientists' views of the film and negative reactions from global warming skeptics some funded by oil companiesread "Did Al Get the Science Right?

In addition to the Oscar, the film won a number of other awards. Not all politicians around the world were positive about the film, however, and in some areas there has been controversy about showing it in schools.

Ethical Issues and Discussion Questions 1. Do you find this film convincing, and if so, will you take action in any way to help reduce emissions? If you don't agree with the film's conclusions, what are your reasons?

Gore declares that there is a moral imperative to act to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming.

Film Review: An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power | Consequence of Sound

He suggests that the moral imperative derives from a duty we have to leave to future generations a planet as habitable as the one we inherited from our ancestors.

What is the exact nature of this duty? A principal reason that the U. For example, legislative measures requiring power plants to substantially increase their use of renewable energy sources could result in many workers losing their jobs, as well as increasing consumer prices.

Gore insists that the economy versus the planet is a false choice. Amidst fears of job loss and recession and without absolute consensus in the scientific community as to the role of carbon dioxide emissions in global warming, let alone popular consensus, how can such legislative measures be justified?"An Inconvenient Truth" by Al Gore, is a documentary that tells us about Global Warming.

As he tells us, Global Warming involves solar radiation, in the form of light waves, passing through the atmosphere. An Inconvenient Truth is a documentary film directed by Davis Guggenheim about former United States Vice President Al Gore's campaign to educate citizens about global warming via a comprehensive slide show that, by his own estimate, he has given more than a thousand times.

In the 10 years since "An Inconvenient Truth" was released, climate researchers have made great progress in predicting how rising temperatures will affect sea level, weather patterns and polar ice.

- Global Warming Global Warming is an important ecological issue and has many negative effects upon our environment.

An analysis of an inconvenient truth a book on the controversial issue of global warming

Global Warming, or what has been called the Greenhouse effect, is the result of a fourfold ecological process. 1-Sunlight radiates from the sun, through space, to Earth’s atmosphere.

2- The sunlight enters the atmosphere . An Inconvenient Truth. FOR ONLY $/PAGE. The movie presents an example of global warming in the analysis of yearly temperature for the past millennia.

Al Gore revealed that the most intense temperatures that have been noted have only occurred recently. Always telling a lie VS always telling the truth.

These days, there is an issue. Al Gore got it wrong “Al Gore's Oscar-winning documentary on global warming, An Inconvenient Truth, was [ ] criticised by a high court judge who highlighted what he said were "nine scientific errors" in the film.

An Inconvenient Truth Rhetorical Analysis by Marque Long on Prezi