Why effective communication is important in online education Abstract Approximately 3.
July All communication is cultural -- it draws on ways we have learned to speak and give nonverbal messages. We do not always communicate the same way from day to day, since factors like context, individual personality, and mood interact with the variety of cultural influences we have internalized that influence our choices.
Communication is interactive, so an important influence on its effectiveness is our relationship with others. Do they hear and understand what we are trying to say?
Are they listening well? Are we listening well in response? Do their responses show that they understand the words and the meanings behind the words we have chosen? Is the mood positive and receptive? Is there trust between them and us?
Are there differences that relate to ineffective communication, divergent goals or interests, or fundamentally different ways of seeing the world? The answers to these questions will give us some clues about the effectiveness of our communication and the ease with which we may be able to move through conflict.
Additional insights into cross-cultural communication are offered by Beyond Intractability project participants.
The challenge is that even with all the good will in the world, miscommunication is likely to happen, especially when there are significant cultural differences between communicators.
Miscommunication may lead to conflict, or aggravate conflict that already exists. We make -- whether it is clear to us or not -- quite different meaning of the world, our places in it, and our relationships with others. In this module, cross-cultural communication will be outlined and demonstrated by examples of ideas, attitudes, and behaviors involving four variables: Time and Space Face and Face-Saving Nonverbal Communication As our familiarity with these different starting points increases, we are cultivating cultural fluency -- awareness of the ways cultures operate in communication and conflict, and the ability to respond effectively to these differences.
Time and Space Time is one of the most central differences that separate cultures and cultural ways of doing things. In the West, time tends to be seen as quantitative, measured in units that reflect the march of progress. It is logical, sequential, and present-focused, moving with incremental certainty toward a future the ego cannot touch and a past that is not a part of now.
Novinger calls the United States a "chronocracy," in which there is such reverence for efficiency and the success of economic endeavors that the expression "time is money" is frequently heard. Robert's Rules of Order, observed in many Western meetings, enforce a monochronic idea of time.
In the East, time feels like it has unlimited continuity, an unraveling rather than a strict boundary. Birth and death are not such absolute ends since the universe continues and humans, though changing form, continue as part of it. People may attend to many things happening at once in this approach to time, called polychronous.
This may mean many conversations in a moment such as a meeting in which people speak simultaneously, "talking over" each other as they discuss their subjectsor many times and peoples during one process such as a ceremony in which those family members who have died are felt to be present as well as those yet to be born into the family.
A good place to look to understand the Eastern idea of time is India. There, time is seen as moving endlessly through various cycles, becoming and vanishing. Time stretches far beyond the human ego or lifetime.
There is a certain timeless quality to time, an aesthetic almost too intricate and vast for the human mind to comprehend. Consider this description of an aeon, the unit of time which elapses between the origin and destruction of a world system: An example of differences over time comes from a negotiation process related to a land claim that took place in Canada.
First Nations people met with representatives from local, regional, and national governments to introduce themselves and begin their work.
During this first meeting, First Nations people took time to tell the stories of their people and their relationships to the land over the past seven generations. They spoke of the spirit of the land, the kinds of things their people have traditionally done on the land, and their sacred connection to it.Communication contexts Unit 3 Starter What are the different types of communication?
Think about a day in school Who are all the different people that you might. Sep 26, · An Analysis of Non-Verbal Behaviour in Intercultural Communication. Abstract Nonverbal communication is a critical component of human communication.
Mcneill (), who inter- prets that both verbal and nonverbal communication are under the concept of communication and are inseparable.
Types of Communication There are three types of communication, including: verbal communication involving listening to a person to understand the meaning of a message, written communication in which a message is read, and nonverbal communication involving observing a person and inferring meaning.
Nonverbal Communication [University] The purpose of nonverbal communication is to make minimum usage of oral communication as well as add that final touch which is . Nonverbal communication observation essay. nonverbal communication essays When most people hear the words Nonverbal Communication the first image that pops into their mind is a picture of a person who is deaf or someone who cannot speak and has learned to communicate through sign language or other nonverbal means of communication.
Abstract Approximately million students logged on in a minimum of one online course in fall consistent with Allen and Seaman (), online education increasing rates have unbroken to outstrip entire higher education growth rates and there aren’t any signs of online growth decreasing.